Study suggests scientific researchers are more neurodivergent than the general population, necessitating more inclusive and thoughtful laboratory design.
A groundbreaking study conducted by ARC – Advanced Research Clusters, HOK, and the University of the West of Scotland (UWS) has revealed that nearly half (48.1%) of all survey respondents who work in lab settings identify as neurodivergent. This is more than double the global average (20%) of people who identify as neurodivergent. Further, a quarter (25.5%) of lab workers responding to the survey identified as autistic, which is 25 times the general UK average (1%).* Because of this, spaces designed to foster technological and scientific innovation are inadvertently stifling the potential of the brilliant minds working within them by not addressing the sensory processing needs of the occupants.
To date, there has been little research into creating inclusive scientific spaces. Focused on science and technology innovators in lab environments, this study aimed to identify how individuals respond to sensory stimulation in current lab designs. It revealed how neurodivergent individuals are particularly sensitive to auditory, visual and tactile elements, exposing that many existing laboratories are not designed to address these needs holistically. These sensory distractions are linked to cognitive interruptions such as loss of focus and disruption of creativity and innovation, which directly impacts employee engagement, satisfaction and productivity.
The study also revealed that fewer than a third (29.9%) of the next generation of innovators consider themselves neurotypical. Without inclusive lab designs, the scientific research profession risks undermining these brilliant minds, leading to reduced productivity, poor recall, burnout, stress and recruitment and retention challenges.
Download the study here.
Dr. Edward Edgerton from UWS said: “Often, neurodivergent employees will manage their work environments by hiding signs of their neurodiversity. However, even when their neurodiversity is recognized, their workplaces can still be exhausting, impacting negatively on their performance and well-being. Few organizations have considered neurodiversity workspace design particularly for laboratories.”
ARC supports over 300 science and tech organizations and over 10,000 innovators. The anonymized study included lab-based users from ARC’s network, including the renowned Harwell Science Campus, science departments at the University of Oxford and participants from selected European science campuses.
Jenny Gardner, ARC’s development director, said: “At ARC, we understand the importance of creating spaces that support our members in solving the world’s greatest challenges. Until now, the industry has failed to address the needs and experiences of neurodiverse individuals, prioritizing sterile, modern looks and open-plan co-working spaces without areas to decompress. We’re committed to changing this by designing inclusive scientific spaces that enable our members to deliver life-changing science.”
The ARC, HOK and UWS team explored ways to identify sensory preferences and challenges and to develop design principles critical to the performance, sense of belonging and overall satisfaction of the entrepreneurs using lab spaces. Studies have shown that spaces that support diverse thinking enhance creativity and innovation by 20%.**
Kay Sargent, HOK’s director of thought leadership, interiors, said: “You don’t have to be neurodivergent to be annoyed by sound, temperature, or light. But what might be annoying for someone who is neurotypical might be debilitating to someone with ADHD, autism or other neurodivergence. It’s about making spaces more functional for 100% of the people. By creating neuro-flexible spaces, we are enabling some of the world’s brightest minds to come together, allowing super-creative entrepreneurs to find their own personal, comfortable space.”
Design strategies identified by HOK that ARC will implement into its future laboratory developments include providing individuals with choices; the right level of sound and auditory controls to support specific tasks; access to daylight and biophilic elements; adjustable ergonomic furniture; areas within the lab to retreat to or reset; and collaborative areas and spaces for doodling.
Daisy Shearer, a quantum physicist and neurodiversity advocate, said: “Ensuring scientific workspaces are designed with neuro-inclusion in mind is an often-overlooked aspect of accessibility and the EDI conversation. It’s great to see these discussions happening around neurodiversity at ARC so we can create inclusive spaces where all neurotypes can thrive. Good research and innovation stems from those who work on it. Ensuring a diverse group of people can access these careers is key.”
* Survey results based on 328 participants with 241 respondents providing usable data. Results do not imply that 48% of the whole ecosystem is neurodivergent but provides a greater understanding of this demographic.
** From “The Diversity and Inclusion Revolution – Eight Powerful Truths” by Juliette Bourke and Bernadette Dillon